ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic hypothermia is a promising treatment to prevent secondary neurologic injury. Clinical utility is limited by systemic complications of global hypothermia. Selective brain cooling remains a largely uninvestigated application. We review techniques of inducing selective brain cooling. METHOD: Literature review. RESULTS: Strategies of inducing selective brain cooling were divided between non-invasive and invasive techniques. Non-invasive techniques were surface cooling and cooling via the upper airway. Invasive cooling methods include transvascular and compartmental (epidural, subdural, subarachnoid and intraventricular) cooling methods to remove heat from the brain. CONCLUSION: Selective brain cooling may offer the best strategy for achieving hypothermic neuroprotection. Non-invasive strategies have proven disappointing in human trials. There is a paucity of human experiments using invasive methods of selective brain cooling. Further application of invasive cooling strategies is needed.
OBJETIVO: A hipotermia terapêutica é uma estratégia promissora para prevenção do dano neurológico secundário. Sua utilidade clínica é limitada por complicações sistêmicas da hipotermia global. Resfriamento cerebral seletivo (RCS), entretanto, permanece uma técnica pouco estudada. Revisamos aqui as diferentes técnicas de indução de RCS. MÉTODO: Revisão de literatura. RESULTADOS: As estratégias de indução de RCS foram divididas em invasivas e não-invasivas. Métodos de remoção de calor do cérebro não-invasivos incluem o resfriamento de superfície e o de vias aéreas superiores; as técnicas invasivas incluem resfriamento transvascular e compartimental (epidural, subdural, subaracnóideo e intraventricular). CONCLUSÃO: RCS pode oferecer a melhor estratégia para alcançar neuroproteção hipotérmica. Estratégias não-invasivas têm se mostrado ineficazes em estudos clínicos. Técnicas invasivas foram raramente estudadas em humanos e necessitam ser mais investigadas para tornarem-se úteis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Brain Injuries/therapy , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Body Temperature , Brain Injuries/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Aim: The aim was to evaluate the visual recovery after managing traumatic cataracts and determine the predictors of a better visual prognosis. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study. We enrolled patients with specific inclusion criteria, examined their eyes to review the comorbidities due to trauma, performed surgery for traumatic cataracts, and implanted lenses. The patients were reexamined 6 weeks postoperatively. We divided the cases of traumatic cataract into two groups, the “open globe” (Group 1) and “closed globe” (Group 2) groups, according to the ocular trauma based on the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System (BETTS) and compared the determinants of visual acuity. Results: Our cohort of 555 eyes with traumatic cataracts included 394 eyes in Group 1 and 161 in Group 2. Six weeks postoperatively, the visual acuity in the operated eye was >20/60 in 193 (48%) and 49 (29%) eyes in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.002, ANOVA). At follow-up, >20/60 vision was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (OR = 1.61; 95% CI, 0.85–3.02). Overall 242 (43.5%) eyes gained a final visual acuity of >20/60. Conclusion: Open globe injury has a favorable prognosis for satisfactory (>20/60) visual recovery after the management of traumatic cataracts.